Parametric/algorithmic architecture
Edited by Tomoko Sakamoto
This Verb monograph, published by Actar, presents the work of six practices, each working with parametric modelling techniques or using generative processes to inform design decisions and strucures.
Inevitably, given the sudden explosion of architects and designers using parametric modelling techniques, this book can offer little more than a glance of current work and offers no historical context. Things are moving so fast that some of the projects featured already seem crude or dated, such as the Serpentine Pavilion by Alvaro Siza, featuring the work of the Avanced Geometry Unit at Arup. The other featured architects/ practices
are Michael Meredith, Mutsuro Sasaki, P.ART (a research team as part of AKT architects), Designtoproduction and Aranda/Lasch.
To cap it all off there's an interview/discussion between Sanford Kwinter which does little to put any perspective on what constitutes parametric or algorithmic architecture, and why it's currently such a hot topic. Is it a movement, a style (as Patrik Schumacher would have it), or a process?.
So while you won't find any answers, context or analysis in this book, it is a fascinating study into the way that six practices are working with parametric design processes.
A word of caution: while it's sometimes easy and convenient to group together Jane Jacobs with New Urbanism, there are some important distinctions between the two. Jacobs's line of thought originated as a critique of the stale and flawed modernist modes of planning that had come to dominate postwar America. She came out of an entirely progressive tradition of political protest and challenges to the status quo as represented by Robert Moses and others. New Urbanism certainly evolved from Jacobs's theories of walkable neighborhoods, small-scale development, etc. -- but at its heart lies a conservative, even reactionary impulse that is contrary to everything espoused by Jane Jacobs in the 60's.
As for Kunstler, I think he belongs in his own, bizarre category. He falls somewhere at the convergence of paranoia, conspiracy theory, and reclusive libertarianism. I agree, though: he is entertaining.
Posted by: progressive reactionary | March 18, 2009 at 09:07 PM
I agree with you that New Urbanist's worship of Jane Jacobs stems from a highly reductionist reading of her work, and taking only the bits that fit their world view.
My comments re Kunstler is more about his ego and self-perception as some kind of heroic continuation of civic struggle that Jacobs engaged in.
Having said all this, I have a deep unease about Jacobs and The Death and Life of Great American Cities, that whole "ballet of the sidewalk" schtick. I'm going to read it again and see if I can put my finger on what troubles me about it.
Posted by: kosmograd | March 23, 2009 at 01:27 PM
Great site and I am really pleased to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor
Posted by: runescape accounts | April 24, 2009 at 08:21 AM